I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the 
corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/infiniband/hw/i40iw/i40iw_main.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/i40iw/i40iw_main.c 
b/drivers/infiniband/hw/i40iw/i40iw_main.c
index c963cad..55da11a 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/i40iw/i40iw_main.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/i40iw/i40iw_main.c
@@ -55,23 +55,23 @@
        __stringify(DRV_VERSION_MINOR) "." __stringify(DRV_VERSION_BUILD)
 
 static int push_mode;
-module_param(push_mode, int, 0644);
+module_param(push_mode, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(push_mode, "Low latency mode: 0=disabled (default), 
1=enabled)");
 
 static int debug;
-module_param(debug, int, 0644);
+module_param(debug, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "debug flags: 0=disabled (default), 0x7fffffff=all");
 
 static int resource_profile;
-module_param(resource_profile, int, 0644);
+module_param(resource_profile, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(resource_profile,
                 "Resource Profile: 0=no VF RDMA support (default), 1=Weighted 
VF, 2=Even Distribution");
 
 static int max_rdma_vfs = 32;
-module_param(max_rdma_vfs, int, 0644);
+module_param(max_rdma_vfs, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(max_rdma_vfs, "Maximum VF count: 0-32 32=default");
 static int mpa_version = 2;
-module_param(mpa_version, int, 0644);
+module_param(mpa_version, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(mpa_version, "MPA version to be used in MPA Req/Resp 1 or 2");
 
 MODULE_AUTHOR("Intel Corporation, <[email protected]>");
-- 
2.9.2

Reply via email to