I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the 
corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/media/i2c/cx25840/cx25840-firmware.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/cx25840/cx25840-firmware.c 
b/drivers/media/i2c/cx25840/cx25840-firmware.c
index 37e0529..464d267 100644
--- a/drivers/media/i2c/cx25840/cx25840-firmware.c
+++ b/drivers/media/i2c/cx25840/cx25840-firmware.c
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
 
 static char *firmware = "";
 
-module_param(firmware, charp, 0444);
+module_param(firmware, charp, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(firmware, "Firmware image to load");
 
-- 
2.9.2

Reply via email to