I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the 
corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/media/dvb-frontends/s5h1411.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/s5h1411.c 
b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/s5h1411.c
index 90f86e8..505240e 100644
--- a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/s5h1411.c
+++ b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/s5h1411.c
@@ -938,7 +938,7 @@ static struct dvb_frontend_ops s5h1411_ops = {
        .release              = s5h1411_release,
 };
 
-module_param(debug, int, 0644);
+module_param(debug, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "Enable verbose debug messages");
 
 MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Samsung S5H1411 QAM-B/ATSC Demodulator driver");
-- 
2.9.2

Reply via email to