I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the 
corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/hwtracing/stm/dummy_stm.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/dummy_stm.c 
b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/dummy_stm.c
index a86612d..7c82ae2 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/dummy_stm.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/dummy_stm.c
@@ -46,11 +46,11 @@ static struct stm_data dummy_stm[DUMMY_STM_MAX];
 
 static int nr_dummies = 4;
 
-module_param(nr_dummies, int, 0400);
+module_param(nr_dummies, int, S_IRUSR);
 
 static unsigned int fail_mode;
 
-module_param(fail_mode, int, 0600);
+module_param(fail_mode, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR);
 
 static int dummy_stm_link(struct stm_data *data, unsigned int master,
                          unsigned int channel)
-- 
2.9.2

Reply via email to