I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <[email protected]> --- drivers/block/aoe/aoecmd.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/block/aoe/aoecmd.c b/drivers/block/aoe/aoecmd.c index d597e43..d12cb94 100644 --- a/drivers/block/aoe/aoecmd.c +++ b/drivers/block/aoe/aoecmd.c @@ -27,11 +27,11 @@ static int count_targets(struct aoedev *d, int *untainted); static struct buf *nextbuf(struct aoedev *); static int aoe_deadsecs = 60 * 3; -module_param(aoe_deadsecs, int, 0644); +module_param(aoe_deadsecs, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(aoe_deadsecs, "After aoe_deadsecs seconds, give up and fail dev."); static int aoe_maxout = 64; -module_param(aoe_maxout, int, 0644); +module_param(aoe_maxout, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(aoe_maxout, "Only aoe_maxout outstanding packets for every MAC on eX.Y."); -- 2.9.2
