I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <[email protected]> --- arch/sh/mm/alignment.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/sh/mm/alignment.c b/arch/sh/mm/alignment.c index ec2b253..6cb05b2 100644 --- a/arch/sh/mm/alignment.c +++ b/arch/sh/mm/alignment.c @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ static int se_usermode = UM_WARN | UM_FIXUP; /* 0: no warning 1: print a warning message, disabled by default */ static int se_kernmode_warn; -core_param(alignment, se_usermode, int, 0600); +core_param(alignment, se_usermode, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR); void inc_unaligned_byte_access(void) { -- 2.9.2
