Nikolay Borisov <[email protected]> writes: > On 08/03/2016 06:06 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >> Digging around... Oh, I see, there's an optional 'lock:..' line in >> /proc/[pid]/fdinfo/[pid] file, is that what you're looking at? I'd >> forgotten. Yeah, maybe that would make more sense long term. > > Yep, that's the one but this requires the userspace to be updated to use > that interface. In the meantime we could do away with some maintenance > of the existing /proc/locks :)
I am tempted to say let's not change /proc/locks at all, but if locks really are in a pid namespace than I do think it makes sense to filter them in /proc just so there is not excessive visiblity outside of the pid namespace. Excessive visibility is a problem on it's own. Eric
