On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 03:02:57PM +0100, Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
> On 31/07/16 21:34, Salah Triki wrote:
> > Remove *befs_sb and just call BEFS_SB(sb) directly, since the returned
> > value by this function is only used once.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Salah Triki <salah.tr...@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/befs/datastream.c | 3 +--
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/befs/datastream.c b/fs/befs/datastream.c
> > index b68b6f9..343123c 100644
> > --- a/fs/befs/datastream.c
> > +++ b/fs/befs/datastream.c
> > @@ -422,10 +422,9 @@ befs_find_brun_dblindirect(struct super_block *sb,
> >     struct buffer_head *indir_block;
> >     befs_block_run indir_run;
> >     befs_disk_inode_addr *iaddr_array;
> > -   struct befs_sb_info *befs_sb = BEFS_SB(sb);
> >  
> >     befs_blocknr_t indir_start_blk =
> > -       data->max_indirect_range >> befs_sb->block_shift;
> > +       data->max_indirect_range >> BEFS_SB(sb)->block_shift;
> >  
> >     off_t dbl_indir_off = blockno - indir_start_blk;
> >  
> > 
> 
> This looks to be consistent with other uses of BEFS_SB() when the value is
> only used once.
> 
> Thanks,
> Luis
> 
> Acked-by: Luis de Bethencourt <lui...@osg.samsung.com>
> 
> Pushed to the befs-next branch:
> https://github.com/luisbg/linux-befs/tree/befs-next

Thanx :)
salah

Reply via email to