On 2016/8/9 1:14, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 08/07/2016 07:49 PM, zhongjiang wrote:
>> From: zhong jiang <zhongji...@huawei.com>
>>
>> when memory hotplug enable, free hugepages will be freed if movable node 
>> offline.
>> therefore, /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages will be incorrect.
>>
>> The patch fix it by reduce the max_huge_pages when the node offline.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongji...@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  mm/hugetlb.c | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
>> index f904246..3356e3a 100644
>> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
>> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
>> @@ -1448,6 +1448,7 @@ static void dissolve_free_huge_page(struct page *page)
>>              list_del(&page->lru);
>>              h->free_huge_pages--;
>>              h->free_huge_pages_node[nid]--;
>> +            h->max_huge_pages--;
>>              update_and_free_page(h, page);
>>      }
>>      spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
>>
> Adding Naoya as he was the original author of this code.
>
> >From quick look it appears that the huge page will be migrated (allocated
> on another node).  If my understanding is correct, then max_huge_pages
> should not be adjusted here.
>
  we need to take free hugetlb pages into account.  of course, the allocated 
huge pages is no
  need to reduce.  The patch just reduce the free hugetlb pages count.

  Thanks
 zhongjiang

Reply via email to