Hi Robert,

[auto build test WARNING on usb/usb-testing]
[also build test WARNING on v4.8-rc1 next-20160809]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help 
improve the system]

url:    
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/robert-foss-collabora-com/usb-xhci-plat-Enable-PM-async-resume-suspend/20160809-234302
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git 
usb-testing
config: i386-randconfig-s0-201632 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.1.1-9) 6.1.1 20160705
reproduce:
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make ARCH=i386 

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c: In function 'xhci_plat_suspend':
>> drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c:303:2: warning: this 'if' clause does not 
>> guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
     if (ret < 0)
     ^~
   drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c:305:3: note: ...this statement, but the latter 
is misleadingly indented as if it is guarded by the 'if'
      return ret;
      ^~~~~~
   drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c: In function 'xhci_plat_resume':
   drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c:327:2: warning: this 'if' clause does not 
guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
     if (ret < 0)
     ^~
   drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c:329:3: note: ...this statement, but the latter 
is misleadingly indented as if it is guarded by the 'if'
      return ret;
      ^~~~~~

vim +/if +303 drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c

   287  
   288          if (!IS_ERR(clk))
   289                  clk_disable_unprepare(clk);
   290          usb_put_hcd(hcd);
   291  
   292          return 0;
   293  }
   294  
   295  #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
   296  static int xhci_plat_suspend(struct device *dev)
   297  {
   298          struct usb_hcd  *hcd = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
   299          struct xhci_hcd *xhci = hcd_to_xhci(hcd);
   300          int ret;
   301  
   302          ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
 > 303          if (ret < 0)
   304                  atomic_dec(&dev->power.usage_count);
   305                  return ret;
   306          /*
   307           * xhci_suspend() needs `do_wakeup` to know whether host is 
allowed
   308           * to do wakeup during suspend. Since xhci_plat_suspend is 
currently
   309           * only designed for system suspend, device_may_wakeup() is 
enough
   310           * to dertermine whether host is allowed to do wakeup. Need to
   311           * reconsider this when xhci_plat_suspend enlarges its scope, 
e.g.,

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation

Attachment: .config.gz
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to