On 08/11/2016 04:00 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: Grygorii Strashko <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 20:02:53 +0300diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c index 0805855..5caef77 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c @@ -732,6 +732,11 @@ static void cpsw_rx_handler(void *token, int len, int status) netif_receive_skb(skb); ndev->stats.rx_bytes += len; ndev->stats.rx_packets++; + /* SKB pointer will be stored in CPPI RAM (SRAM) which belongs + * to MMIO space, as result false positive memory leak report + * will be generated. + */ + kmemleak_not_leak(new_skb); } else { ndev->stats.rx_dropped++; new_skb = skb;There is already a kmemleak_not_leak() statement here in the current driver. Please always develop and generate patches against current sources.
Oh. Sorry, I've expected to receive merge notification (as you do usually), but I didn't see it. I'll be more careful in the future.
Sorry again. -- regards, -grygorii

