On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:03:47AM +0100, Luis de Bethencourt wrote: > On 10/08/16 22:41, Salah Triki wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 11:01:23PM +0100, Luis de Bethencourt wrote: > >> befs_dump_super_block() wasn't giving the inode_size information when > >> dumping all elements of the superblock. Add this element to have complete > >> information of the superblock. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt <lui...@osg.samsung.com> > >> --- > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> This is a series of superblock information related changes. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Luis > >> > >> fs/befs/debug.c | 1 + > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/fs/befs/debug.c b/fs/befs/debug.c > >> index 4de7cff..85c1339 100644 > >> --- a/fs/befs/debug.c > >> +++ b/fs/befs/debug.c > >> @@ -169,6 +169,7 @@ befs_dump_super_block(const struct super_block *sb, > >> befs_super_block * sup) > >> > >> befs_debug(sb, " num_blocks %llu", fs64_to_cpu(sb, sup->num_blocks)); > >> befs_debug(sb, " used_blocks %llu", fs64_to_cpu(sb, sup->used_blocks)); > >> + befs_debug(sb, " inode_size %u", fs32_to_cpu(sb, sup->inode_size)); > >> > >> befs_debug(sb, " magic2 %08x", fs32_to_cpu(sb, sup->magic2)); > >> befs_debug(sb, " blocks_per_ag %u", > >> -- > >> 2.5.1 > >> > > > > Signed-off-by: Salah Triki <salah.tr...@gmail.com> > > > > Thanx > > Salah > > > > Hi Salah, > > I prefer applying this series as a set. So will wait for your review of patch > 2/4. > > Let me know if you don't have time for it. > > Thanks for the reviews, > Luis
Hi Luis, I am reviewing the patch 2/4 regards, Salah
