On Sat, 13 Aug 2016, Amitoj Kaur Chawla wrote:

> devm_pinctrl_register returns an ERR_PTR in case of error and should
> have an IS_ERR check instead of a null check.
>
> The Coccinelle semantic patch used to make this change is as follows:
> @@
> expression e;
> @@
>
>   e = devm_pinxtrl_register(...);

Actually, there is a typo here.  devm_pinxtrl_register should be
devm_pinctrl_register.

julia

> if(
> -    !e
> +    IS_ERR(e)
>     )
>     {
>   <+...
>   return
> - ...
> + PTR_ERR(e)
>   ;
>   ...+>
>   }
>
> Signed-off-by: Amitoj Kaur Chawla <amitoj1...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dpaux.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dpaux.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dpaux.c
> index 059f409..2fde44c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dpaux.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dpaux.c
> @@ -539,9 +539,9 @@ static int tegra_dpaux_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>       dpaux->desc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
>
>       dpaux->pinctrl = devm_pinctrl_register(&pdev->dev, &dpaux->desc, dpaux);
> -     if (!dpaux->pinctrl) {
> +     if (IS_ERR(dpaux->pinctrl)) {
>               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register pincontrol\n");
> -             return -ENODEV;
> +             return PTR_ERR(dpaux->pinctrl);
>       }
>  #endif
>       /* enable and clear all interrupts */
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>

Reply via email to