On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 4:24 PM, John Stultz <[email protected]> wrote:
> As requested, this patch checks the existing LSM hooks
> task_getscheduler/task_setscheduler when reading or modifying
> the task's timerslack value.
>
> Previous versions added new get/settimerslack LSM hooks, but
> since they checked the same PROCESS__SET/GETSCHED values as
> existing hooks, it was suggested we just use the existing ones.
>
> Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
> CC: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
> Cc: Oren Laadan <[email protected]>
> Cc: Ruchi Kandoi <[email protected]>
> Cc: Rom Lemarchand <[email protected]>
> Cc: Todd Kjos <[email protected]>
> Cc: Colin Cross <[email protected]>
> Cc: Nick Kralevich <[email protected]>
> Cc: Dmitry Shmidt <[email protected]>
> Cc: Elliott Hughes <[email protected]>
> Cc: James Morris <[email protected]>
> Cc: Android Kernel Team <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <[email protected]>
> ---
> v2:
>  * Initial swing at adding settimerslack LSM hook
> v3:
>  * Fix current/p switchup bug noted by NickK
>  * Add gettimerslack hook suggested by NickK
> v4:
>  * Dropped adding get/settimerslack LSM hooks, and
>    just reuse the get/setscheduler ones.
>
>  fs/proc/base.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

For some reason I'm having a hard time finding patch 1/2 in the
patchset, but this patch looks reasonable to me.  We already have some
LSM checking via the ptrace_may_access() call, but this adds some
additional granularity which could be a good thing.

Acked-by: Paul Moore <[email protected]>

> diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
> index c94abae..02f8389 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/base.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
> @@ -2286,6 +2286,12 @@ static ssize_t timerslack_ns_write(struct file *file, 
> const char __user *buf,
>                 goto out;
>         }
>
> +       err = security_task_setscheduler(p);
> +       if (err) {
> +               count = err;
> +               goto out;
> +       }
> +
>         task_lock(p);
>         if (slack_ns == 0)
>                 p->timer_slack_ns = p->default_timer_slack_ns;
> @@ -2314,6 +2320,10 @@ static int timerslack_ns_show(struct seq_file *m, void 
> *v)
>                 goto out;
>         }
>
> +       err = security_task_getscheduler(p);
> +       if (err)
> +               goto out;
> +
>         task_lock(p);
>         seq_printf(m, "%llu\n", p->timer_slack_ns);
>         task_unlock(p);
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
> linux-security-module" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com

Reply via email to