On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 11:46 +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > Use scsi_is_sas_rphy() instead of is_sas_attached() to decide whether > we should obtain the SAS address from a scsi device or not. This will > prevent us from tripping on the BUG_ON() in sas_sdev_to_rdev() if the > rphy isn't attached to the SAS transport class, like it is with > hpsa's logical devices.
For the entire series: Reviewed-by: James E.J. Bottomley <[email protected]> > Fixes: 3f8d6f2a0 ('ses: fix discovery of SATA devices in SAS > enclosures') > Cc: [email protected] # v4.5+ Except that we can't tag this for stable because without 1/3 it will induce a compile failure within stable. This means you're going to have to do the stable process manually and submit both patches to stable and explain the dependency, once they're upstream. James
