Eric W. Biederman wrote: > I'm pretty certain we explicitly drop the weird GNU note that > is automatically generated by gcc and specifies something informational. > But that's something else again, since it appears as a PT_GNU_STACK phdr.
> I don't think anything we are doing is wrong but ld gets confused easily > in the corner cases. I'm modestly surprised we didn't have to mark our > .note.xxx scions as ".section .note.xxx @note" or whatever the proper > gas syntax is. I did try that, and it didn't make a difference. The manual says that the output section type follows the input section type, so I agree its a bit surprising we ever get a SHT_NOTE out of it without the @note stuff. J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/