Well, as appeared - the patch did not affect the problem at all since the memory cgroup was on (in which case zone's inactive_ratio is not used, but the ratio is calculated directly at mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low()). So the patch will be retested with memory cgroup off.
Andriy On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:46 PM, Andriy Tkachuk <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Andriy Tkachuk > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> The following patch resolved the problem: >> ... > > Sorry, I was too hurry in sending good news. As appeared - the problem > is still there: >
