On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:36:29PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
> >  i2c-octeon-objs := i2c-cavium.o i2c-octeon-core.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_OCTEON)   += i2c-octeon.o
> > +i2c-thunderx-objs := i2c-cavium.o i2c-thunderx-core.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_THUNDERX) += i2c-thunderx.o
> 
> Shouldn't that rather be "i2c-cavium-core.o",

Thinking of it again, it should probably even be "i2c-octeon-core.o" to
avoid confusion because all the functions start with octeon_*

> "i2c-octeon-platdrv.o",  and "i2c-thunderx-pcidrv.o" for the -objs?

Those names still make sense :)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to