Zachary Amsden wrote: > So Rusty, Chris, Jeremy, any objections to killing udelay() and > friends in paravirt-ops? It would simplify things a bit. The only > thing we lose is a slightly faster boot time in the 100% emulated > device case. I'm ok with losing that. Even the PIT fast paths don't > use udelay, so I don't think we care for runtime performance at all.
Fine with me. That always seemed a bit warty to me. J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/