The workqueue "afs_vlocation_update_worker" queues a single work item
&afs_vlocation_update and hence it doesn't require execution ordering.
Hence, alloc_workqueue has been used to replace the deprecated
create_singlethread_workqueue instance.

Since the workqueue is being used on a memory reclaim path, WQ_MEM_RECLAIM
flag has been set to ensure forward progress under memory pressure.

Since there are fixed number of work items, explicit concurrency
limit is unnecessary here.

Signed-off-by: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <[email protected]>
---
 Changes in v2:
        -No change.

 fs/afs/vlocation.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/afs/vlocation.c b/fs/afs/vlocation.c
index 5297678..45a8639 100644
--- a/fs/afs/vlocation.c
+++ b/fs/afs/vlocation.c
@@ -594,8 +594,8 @@ static void afs_vlocation_reaper(struct work_struct *work)
  */
 int __init afs_vlocation_update_init(void)
 {
-       afs_vlocation_update_worker =
-               create_singlethread_workqueue("kafs_vlupdated");
+       afs_vlocation_update_worker = alloc_workqueue("kafs_vlupdated",
+                                                     WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
        return afs_vlocation_update_worker ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
 }

--
2.1.4

Reply via email to