On Aug 31, 2016, at 5:31 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Oleg Drokin <gr...@linuxhacker.ru> > Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 23:14:06 -0400 > >> %ul would print an unsigned with a letter l at the end which does >> not seem to be desired here, on the other hand the value being printed >> is u32 so just drop the l instead of converting to %lu >> >> Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <gr...@linuxhacker.ru> > > %u is for unsigned values, and these are "s32" thus signed.
Hm, you are right. I could swear I saw them as unsigned when I looked at it. Anyway can they really be negative? they are seconds and usec, should I change them to u32 too?
