On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 7:09 AM, Heikki Krogerus
<heikki.kroge...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 05:40:17PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> @@ -174,14 +219,37 @@ static int ulpi_register(struct device *dev, struct
>> ulpi *ulpi)
>> ulpi->id.product = ulpi_read(ulpi, ULPI_PRODUCT_ID_LOW);
>> ulpi->id.product |= ulpi_read(ulpi, ULPI_PRODUCT_ID_HIGH) << 8;
>>
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int ulpi_register(struct device *dev, struct ulpi *ulpi)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> ulpi->dev.parent = dev;
>> ulpi->dev.bus = &ulpi_bus;
>> ulpi->dev.type = &ulpi_dev_type;
>> dev_set_name(&ulpi->dev, "%s.ulpi", dev_name(dev));
>>
>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)) {
>
> I don't think you need to check that in this case.
>
>> + ret = ulpi_of_register(ulpi);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&ulpi->dev, ACPI_COMPANION(dev));
>
> ACPI_COMPANION_SET will overwrite the primary fwnode unconditionally,
> so just to play it safe, do this before you call ulpi_of_register().
Ok.
>
>> - request_module("ulpi:v%04xp%04x", ulpi->id.vendor, ulpi->id.product);
>> + ret = ulpi_read_id(ulpi);
>> + /*
>> + * Ignore failure in case of DT node because the device may
>> + * not be powered up yet but we can still match by compatible
>> + */
>> + if (ret && !ulpi->dev.of_node)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + if (of_device_request_module(&ulpi->dev))
>> + request_module("ulpi:v%04xp%04x", ulpi->id.vendor,
>> + ulpi->id.product);
>
> I don't think this works in all cases. If of_device_request_module()
> fails and we don't have the id.vendor/product set, we should not
> register the device. It also looks a bit messy.
>
> How about just using of_device_request_module() call as fallback in
> ulpi_read_id() and moving also request_module() call there:
Sure I'll fold it in and test. Should we "goto err" if we can't read
the scratch register though? I would think that's a "real" failure and
we shouldn't try to support DT in that case.
