The new ultimate compaction priority disables some heuristics, which may result
in excessive cost. This is fine for non-costly orders where we want to try hard
before resulting for OOM, but might be disruptive for costly orders which do
not trigger OOM and should generally have some fallback. Thus, we disable the
full priority for costly orders.

Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>
Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]>
Cc: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
---
 include/linux/compaction.h | 1 +
 mm/page_alloc.c            | 5 ++++-
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/compaction.h b/include/linux/compaction.h
index 585d55cb0dc0..0d8415820fc3 100644
--- a/include/linux/compaction.h
+++ b/include/linux/compaction.h
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ enum compact_priority {
        COMPACT_PRIO_SYNC_FULL,
        MIN_COMPACT_PRIORITY = COMPACT_PRIO_SYNC_FULL,
        COMPACT_PRIO_SYNC_LIGHT,
+       MIN_COMPACT_COSTLY_PRIORITY = COMPACT_PRIO_SYNC_LIGHT,
        DEF_COMPACT_PRIORITY = COMPACT_PRIO_SYNC_LIGHT,
        COMPACT_PRIO_ASYNC,
        INIT_COMPACT_PRIORITY = COMPACT_PRIO_ASYNC
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index f8bed910e3cf..ff60a2837c58 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -3165,6 +3165,7 @@ should_compact_retry(struct alloc_context *ac, int order, 
int alloc_flags,
                     int compaction_retries)
 {
        int max_retries = MAX_COMPACT_RETRIES;
+       int min_priority;
 
        if (!order)
                return false;
@@ -3204,7 +3205,9 @@ should_compact_retry(struct alloc_context *ac, int order, 
int alloc_flags,
         * if we exhausted all retries at the lower priorities
         */
 check_priority:
-       if (*compact_priority > MIN_COMPACT_PRIORITY) {
+       min_priority = (order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER) ?
+                       MIN_COMPACT_COSTLY_PRIORITY : MIN_COMPACT_PRIORITY;
+       if (*compact_priority > min_priority) {
                (*compact_priority)--;
                return true;
        }
-- 
2.9.3

Reply via email to