On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 13:57 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:00:43PM +0000, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2016-08-29 at 15:31 -0600, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 2016-08-29 at 23:48 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > > > : > > Looking further, these shmem_huge handlings only check pre- > > conditions. So, we should > > be able to make shmem_get_unmapped_area() as a wrapper, which > > checks such shmem-specific conitions, and > > then call __thp_get_unmapped_area() for the actual work. All DAX- > > specific checks are performed in thp_get_unmapped_area() as well. > > We can make __thp_get_unmapped_area() as a common function. > > > > I'd prefer to make such change as a separate item, > > Do you have plan to submit such change?
Yes, I will submit the change once I finish testing. Thanks, -Toshi
