On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 17:38 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 07:10:39PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 16:29 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > > > > > > ...and then we correctly report that the optional supply that > > > isn't > > > mapped (as far as I remember) isn't there. > > > > > But it *will be* soon there. > > > > > Hmm... And the proper fix for this case is... (let's assume there > > will > > not be device tree solution in nearest future)? > > To supply this particular mapping before you set full constraints.
Thanks for patience and explanation. I will look later how to achieve this. > > > > > If I remove has_full_constraints() call I will get EPROBE_DEFER on > > all > > optional regulators IIRC. > > Yes. Which basically means that's not a solution I'm trying to get. -- Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> Intel Finland Oy
