On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 10:50 +0100, Alex Riesen wrote:
> > The arch/i386/kernel/process.c part of the patch should apply to 2.6.20
> > as well. Can you check if the problem is there too ?
> 
> It does not apply and does not look trivially hackable.
> The code for cpu_idle was introduced in 2ff2d3d7 "i386: add idle notifier".

Here you go.

        tglx

Index: linux-2.6.20/arch/i386/kernel/process.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.20.orig/arch/i386/kernel/process.c
+++ linux-2.6.20/arch/i386/kernel/process.c
@@ -189,6 +189,13 @@ void cpu_idle(void)
                                play_dead();
 
                        __get_cpu_var(irq_stat).idle_timestamp = jiffies;
+
+                       local_irq_disable();
+                       if (local_softirq_pending() && !need_resched())
+                               printk(KERN_ERR
+                                      "Idle: local softirq pending: %04x\n",
+                                      local_softirq_pending());
+                       local_irq_enable();
                        idle();
                }
                preempt_enable_no_resched();




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to