On Sunday 18 February 2007 00:52:15 Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> >
> > Hello , I am sorry that I missed some parts of coding style. I need to
> > reread it :-)
> >
> > There is a updated patch :
>
> It looks better.
>
> > + /* Disable Interrupt */
> > + outl (0, dev->base_addr + DCR7);
> > + outl (inl(dev->base_addr + DCR5), dev->base_addr + DCR5);
>
> I'd kill space after outl...
>
> > + /* Free RX buffers */
> > + dmfe_free_rxbuffer(db);
> > +
> > + /* Power down device*/
>
> and add space before */.
>
> Congratulation, you passed coding-style-police-check ;-).
> Pavel
>
Hello,
Thanks for reply, I just want to ask one question:
Those patches are now merged in -mm, and I noticed that Andrew Morton
after applying them did fix my bad coding style and check for CONFIG_PM=n that
I didn't include
Now should I resend two last patches or not ?
Regards, Maxim Levitsky
PS: Actualy I have planned to send those patches a little bit later , and do
more checks like the coding style stuff, mailer problems, etc...
but I noticed that 2.6.20 breaks link detection on my card,
and I even saw report here on LKML about that, so I decided to send them now
Of cource I did check them for code correctness , and I actualy used them for
about a month.
I tried to do as little as possible changes, and verify each line.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
