On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 04:08:36PM +0000, Brown, Len wrote:
> > +                   crystal_khz = 24000;    /* 25.0 MHz */
> 
> I guess I prefer no comment over an incorrect comment.
> 

>From this I take it it should really have been 24 MHz and it could have
joined the existing case. I assumed (ha!) that since it had a special
separate case the comment was correct.

Reply via email to