Hi Stephen, Michael,

2016-08-26 0:27 GMT+09:00 Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com>:
> On 08/24/2016 10:26 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> Many of clk_disable() implementations just return for NULL pointer,
>> but this check is missing from some.  Let's make it tree-wide
>> consistent.  It will allow clock consumers to call clk_disable()
>> without NULL pointer check.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masah...@socionext.com>
>> Acked-by: Greg Ungerer <g...@uclinux.org>
>> Acked-by: Wan Zongshun <mcuos....@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>
>> I came back after a long pause.
>> You can see the discussion about the previous version:
>> https://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2016-04/msg00063.html
>>
>>
>> Changes in v3:
>>   - Return only when clk is NULL.  Do not take care of error pointer.
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>>   - Rebase on Linux 4.6-rc1
>>
>>  arch/arm/mach-mmp/clock.c        | 3 +++
>>  arch/arm/mach-w90x900/clock.c    | 3 +++
>>  arch/blackfin/mach-bf609/clock.c | 3 +++
>>  arch/m68k/coldfire/clk.c         | 4 ++++
>>  arch/mips/bcm63xx/clk.c          | 3 +++
>


Gentle ping...


If you are not keen on this,
shall I split it per-arch and send to each arch subsystem?



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

Reply via email to