On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:18:07AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 08:05:19AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 03:45:53PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > Sending a pull request for code that's never been seen upstream seems > > > completely premature. > > > Hey, how does code get upstream then? :) > > By having the actual code to the mailing list.
Ugh, vger keeps blocking the patches, I'm going to try for a third time now... > > As for the drivers all living under drivers/greybus/ I understand, but > > we need the greybus core present first before we can get the drivers in. > > How about we do what happened with IIO, we take the greybus core code in > > drivers/greybus/ and put the drivers in staging, and then move them out > > of staging into the "real" portion of the kernel as they get reviewed > > and accepted? > > Yes, staging would be appropriate for unreviewed code. Sounds good. thanks, greg k-h