On 9/16/16 1:39 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 01:30:28PM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
>>> [root@pcs7 iproute2]# misc/ss -A raw
>>> State      Recv-Q Send-Q                                Local Address:Port  
>>>                                                Peer Address:Port            
>>>     
>>> ESTAB      0      0                                         
>>> 127.0.0.1:ipproto-255                                            
>>> 127.0.0.10:ipproto-9090         
>>> UNCONN     0      0                                        
>>> 127.0.0.10:ipproto-255                                                     
>>> *:*                    
>>> UNCONN     0      0                                                
>>> :::ipv6-icmp                                                      :::*      
>>>               
>>> UNCONN     0      0                                                
>>> :::ipv6-icmp                                                      :::*      
>>>               
>>> ESTAB      0      0                                               
>>> ::1:ipproto-255                                                   
>>> ::1:ipproto-9091         
>>>
>>> so it get zapped out. Is there some other way to test it?
>>>
>>
>> I'm guessing you passed IPPROTO_RAW (255) as the protocol to socket(). If 
>> you pass something
>> else (IPPROTO_ICMP for example) it won't work.
> 
> True. To support IPPROTO_ICMP it need enhancement. I thought start with
> plain _RAW first and then extend to support _ICMP.

I thought raw in this case was SOCK_RAW as in the socket type.

Since the display is showing sockets in addition to IPPROTO_RAW:

$ ss -A raw
State      Recv-Q Send-Q        Local Address:Port                         Peer 
Address:Port
UNCONN     0      0                    *%eth0:icmp                              
      *:*

It is going to be confusing if only ipproto-255 sockets can be killed.

Reply via email to