Le 18/09/2016 à 11:04, Masahiro Yamada a écrit :
> In many of clk_disable() implementations, it is a no-op for a NULL
> pointer input, but this is one of the exceptions.
> Making it treewide consistent will allow clock consumers to call
> clk_disable() without NULL pointer check.
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masah...@socionext.com>

Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to