From: Dmitry Eremin <dmitry.ere...@intel.com> Change the type accordant usage.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin <dmitry.ere...@intel.com> Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-5577 Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/12385 Reviewed-by: Bob Glossman <bob.gloss...@intel.com> Reviewed-by: John L. Hammond <john.hamm...@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <oleg.dro...@intel.com> Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimm...@infradead.org> --- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c | 8 ++++---- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c index 4395117..7339c8b 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ int lu_site_purge(const struct lu_env *env, struct lu_site *s, int nr) * the dispose list, removing them from LRU and hash table. */ start = s->ls_purge_start; - bnr = (nr == ~0) ? -1 : nr / CFS_HASH_NBKT(s->ls_obj_hash) + 1; + bnr = (nr == ~0) ? -1 : nr / (int)CFS_HASH_NBKT(s->ls_obj_hash) + 1; again: /* * It doesn't make any sense to make purge threads parallel, that can @@ -869,11 +869,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(lu_site_print); /** * Return desired hash table order. */ -static unsigned int lu_htable_order(struct lu_device *top) +static unsigned long lu_htable_order(struct lu_device *top) { unsigned long bits_max = LU_SITE_BITS_MAX; unsigned long cache_size; - unsigned int bits; + unsigned long bits; /* * Calculate hash table size, assuming that we want reasonable @@ -990,7 +990,7 @@ int lu_site_init(struct lu_site *s, struct lu_device *top) memset(s, 0, sizeof(*s)); mutex_init(&s->ls_purge_mutex); - snprintf(name, 16, "lu_site_%s", top->ld_type->ldt_name); + snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "lu_site_%s", top->ld_type->ldt_name); for (bits = lu_htable_order(top); bits >= LU_SITE_BITS_MIN; bits--) { s->ls_obj_hash = cfs_hash_create(name, bits, bits, bits - LU_SITE_BKT_BITS, -- 1.7.1
