> On Sep 18, 2016, at 23:18, Nayeemahmed Badebade <itachi.op...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Added __acquires / __releases sparse locking annotations
> to lock_res_and_lock() and unlock_res_and_lock() functions
> in l_lock.c, to fix below sparse warnings:
> 
> l_lock.c:47:22: warning: context imbalance in 'lock_res_and_lock' - wrong 
> count at exit
> l_lock.c:61:6: warning: context imbalance in 'unlock_res_and_lock' - 
> unexpected unlock
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nayeemahmed Badebade <itachi.op...@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dil...@intel.com>

> ---
> 
> Changes in v2:
> * Corrected sparse annotations for the lock
>   lock->l_resource->lr_lock
> 
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/l_lock.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/l_lock.c 
> b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/l_lock.c
> index ea8840c..3845f38 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/l_lock.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/l_lock.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@
>  * being an atomic operation.
>  */
> struct ldlm_resource *lock_res_and_lock(struct ldlm_lock *lock)
> +                             __acquires(&lock->l_lock)
> +                             __acquires(&lock->l_resource->lr_lock)
> {
>       spin_lock(&lock->l_lock);
> 
> @@ -59,6 +61,8 @@ struct ldlm_resource *lock_res_and_lock(struct ldlm_lock 
> *lock)
>  * Unlock a lock and its resource previously locked with lock_res_and_lock
>  */
> void unlock_res_and_lock(struct ldlm_lock *lock)
> +             __releases(&lock->l_resource->lr_lock)
> +             __releases(&lock->l_lock)
> {
>       /* on server-side resource of lock doesn't change */
>       ldlm_clear_res_locked(lock);
> --
> 1.9.1
> 

Reply via email to