On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 04:18:47PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/msi.c b/kernel/irq/msi.c
> index 19e9dfb..8a3e8727 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/msi.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/msi.c
> @@ -18,20 +18,42 @@
>  /* Temparory solution for building, will be removed later */
>  #include <linux/pci.h>
>  
> -struct msi_desc *alloc_msi_entry(struct device *dev)
> +/**
> + * alloc_msi_entry - Allocate an initialize msi_entry
> + * @dev:     Pointer to the device for which this is allocated
> + * @nvec:    The number of vectors used in this entry
> + * @affinity:        Optional pointer to an affinity mask array size of @nvec
> + *
> + * If @affinity is not NULL then a an affinity array[@nvec] is allocated
> + * and the affinity masks from @affinity are copied.
> + */
> +struct msi_desc *
> +alloc_msi_entry(struct device *dev, int nvec, const struct cpumask *affinity)
>  {
> -     struct msi_desc *desc = kzalloc(sizeof(*desc), GFP_KERNEL);
> +     struct msi_desc *desc;
> +
> +     desc = kzalloc(sizeof(*desc), GFP_KERNEL);
>       if (!desc)
>               return NULL;
>  
>       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&desc->list);
>       desc->dev = dev;
> +     desc->nvec_used = nvec;
> +     if (affinity) {
> +             desc->affinity = kmemdup(affinity,
> +                     nvec * sizeof(*desc->affinity), GFP_KERNEL);
> +             if (!desc->affinity) {
> +                     kfree(desc);
> +                     return NULL;
> +             }
> +     }

nit - should not "desc" initialization follow "desc->affinity" allocation?

>       return desc;
>  }
>  
>  void free_msi_entry(struct msi_desc *entry)
>  {
> +     kfree(entry->affinity);
>       kfree(entry);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.1.4
> 

Reply via email to