>>> A single error message should be sufficient to inform about
>>> the detection of an unknown GCT revision at the end.
>>> Thus return after the logging call in this case directly.
>> Did you test this?
> Don't be a dummy... This is easy to review an it fixes a bug.
Thanks for this kind of constructive feedback.
> I'm fine with you NAKing all these patches based on who they are from.
Would you like to clarify such an information a bit more?
> I mostly just delete these without responding because the guy has
> history of introducing bugs and never listens to feedback.
I admit that I'll stumble on programming mistakes again occasionally
as another ordinary free software developer who is struggling various open
I am listening to various feedback. My responses might not be pleasing enough
for you. Are you looking for any special information to improve
a corresponding discussion?