Cc += Shawn Hello,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 01:02:24PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > Julia Lawall wrote a script > > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.10.1609201503260.2914@hadrien > > that found a possible issue with macro argument precedence. > > > diff -u -p a/arch/arm/mach-imx/iomux-mx3.h b/arch/arm/mach-imx/iomux-mx3.h > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/iomux-mx3.h > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/iomux-mx3.h > @@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ enum iomux_pins { > #define MX31_PIN_DCD_DTE1__DCD_DTE2 IOMUX_MODE(MX31_PIN_DCD_DTE1, > IOMUX_CONFIG_ALT1) > #define MX31_PIN_RI_DTE1__RI_DTE2 IOMUX_MODE(MX31_PIN_RI_DTE1, > IOMUX_CONFIG_ALT1) > #define MX31_PIN_DSR_DTE1__DSR_DTE2 IOMUX_MODE(MX31_PIN_DSR_DTE1, > IOMUX_CONFIG_ALT1) > -#define MX31_PIN_DTR_DTE1__DTR_DTE2 IOMUX_MODE(MX31_PIN_DTR_DTE1, > IOMUX_OCONFIG_ALT3 | IOMUX_ICONFIG_NONE) > +#define MX31_PIN_DTR_DTE1__DTR_DTE2 IOMUX_MODE(MX31_PIN_DTR_DTE1, > (IOMUX_OCONFIG_ALT3 | IOMUX_ICONFIG_NONE)) > #define MX31_PIN_PC_RST__CTS5 IOMUX_MODE(MX31_PIN_PC_RST, > IOMUX_CONFIG_ALT2) > #define MX31_PIN_PC_VS2__RTS5 IOMUX_MODE(MX31_PIN_PC_VS2, > IOMUX_CONFIG_ALT2) > #define MX31_PIN_PC_BVD2__TXD5 IOMUX_MODE(MX31_PIN_PC_BVD2, > IOMUX_CONFIG_ALT2) I assume this is the only problematic definition? If so, there is a single affected platform: arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-kzm_arm11_01.c > this may be intentional, but perhaps a solution > would be to use parentheses in the #define IOMUX_MODE > > --- > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/iomux-mx3.h b/arch/arm/mach-imx/iomux-mx3.h > index 368667b..3f9ede2 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/iomux-mx3.h > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/iomux-mx3.h > @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ void mxc_iomux_mode(unsigned int pin_mode); > (((gpionum << IOMUX_GPIONUM_SHIFT) & IOMUX_GPIONUM_MASK) | \ > (padnum & IOMUX_PADNUM_MASK)) > > -#define IOMUX_MODE(pin, mode) (pin | mode << IOMUX_MODE_SHIFT) > +#define IOMUX_MODE(pin, mode) ((pin) | ((mode) << IOMUX_MODE_SHIFT)) > > #define IOMUX_TO_GPIO(iomux_pin) \ > ((iomux_pin & IOMUX_GPIONUM_MASK) >> IOMUX_GPIONUM_SHIFT) My preference is to fix IOMUX_MODE instead of adding the parents to MX31_PIN_DTR_DTE1__DTR_DTE2. Joe, do you create a proper patch? Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
