Greg,

As a reminder, I think we agreed that this one could go through the at91
tree because of the dependency on patch 2/6.

I'd like to get your ack though.

On 22/09/2016 at 00:09:38 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote :
> The Atmel secure SRAM is connected to a security module and may be erased
> automatically under certain conditions. For that reason, it is necessary to
> wait for the security module to flag that SRAM accesses are allowed before
> accessing it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.bell...@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
> Cc: Philipp Zabel <p.za...@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
> 
>  drivers/misc/sram.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/sram.c b/drivers/misc/sram.c
> index f84b53d6ce50..b0d4dd9b0586 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/sram.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/sram.c
> @@ -19,12 +19,17 @@
>   */
>  
>  #include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>  #include <linux/genalloc.h>
>  #include <linux/io.h>
>  #include <linux/list_sort.h>
>  #include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> +#include <soc/at91/atmel-secumod.h>
>  
>  #define SRAM_GRANULARITY     32
>  
> @@ -334,12 +339,35 @@ static int sram_reserve_regions(struct sram_dev *sram, 
> struct resource *res)
>       return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int atmel_securam_wait(void)
> +{
> +     struct regmap *regmap;
> +     u32 val;
> +
> +     regmap = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("atmel,sama5d2-secumod");
> +     if (IS_ERR(regmap))
> +             return -ENODEV;
> +
> +     return regmap_read_poll_timeout(regmap, AT91_SECUMOD_RAMRDY, val,
> +                                     val & AT91_SECUMOD_RAMRDY_READY,
> +                                     10000, 500000);
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +static const struct of_device_id sram_dt_ids[] = {
> +     { .compatible = "mmio-sram" },
> +     { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d2-securam", .data = atmel_securam_wait },
> +     {}
> +};
> +#endif
> +
>  static int sram_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>       struct sram_dev *sram;
>       struct resource *res;
>       size_t size;
>       int ret;
> +     int (*init_func)(void);
>  
>       sram = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*sram), GFP_KERNEL);
>       if (!sram)
> @@ -384,6 +412,13 @@ static int sram_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, sram);
>  
> +     init_func = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> +     if (init_func) {
> +             ret = init_func();
> +             if (ret)
> +                     return ret;
> +     }
> +
>       dev_dbg(sram->dev, "SRAM pool: %zu KiB @ 0x%p\n",
>               gen_pool_size(sram->pool) / 1024, sram->virt_base);
>  
> @@ -405,13 +440,6 @@ static int sram_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> -static const struct of_device_id sram_dt_ids[] = {
> -     { .compatible = "mmio-sram" },
> -     {}
> -};
> -#endif
> -
>  static struct platform_driver sram_driver = {
>       .driver = {
>               .name = "sram",
> -- 
> 2.9.3
> 

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Reply via email to