On 09/19/2016 11:13 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 09/19/2016 06:21 PM, Daniel Mentz wrote:
>> > Hi Vineet,
>> > Thank you for your patches. I applied them, and verified that
>> > unwinding works with code that is compiled into the kernel image as
>> > well as kernel modules.
>> > I confirmed that the .eh_frame section is present and that the
>> > .debug_frame section is absent. I also verified that the file size of
>> > the .ko files are small enough for our embedded platform and that
>> > unnecessary sections like .debug_info, .debug_line, .debug_str etc.
>> > are also absent.
>> > Is there anything else you want me to test?
>> > Thanks
>> > Daniel
> Nope - that is it. Just wanted to make sure it is "field" tested :-)
FYI - I've pushed some more changes to unwinding department so that we get
call-traces for memset/memcpy et al.