On Friday, September 23, 2016 8:50:10 PM CEST Baoyou Xie wrote:
> We get 1 warning when building kernel with W=1:
> drivers/regulator/dbx500-prcmu.c:158:27: warning: no previous prototype for
> 'dbx500_regulator_testcase' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>
> In fact, this function is not declared in any file, but should be
> declared in a header file. thus can be recognized in other file.
>
> So this patch adds the declaration into
> drivers/regulator/dbx500-prcmu.h.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <[email protected]>
>
I'm always suspicious of a patch that only adds a declaration,
as that tends to mean that no other caller ever existed. In this
case, there is an empty "__weak" function definition and it
is called from the driver itself, but there is no other non-weak
definition. If there was another definition, it would probably
be wrong, so I'd just remove the function completely and not
call it.
Arnd