On Wednesday February 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:35:16 +1100
> NeilBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > + for (i = conf->raid_disks ; i-- ; ) {
>
> That statement should be dragged out, shot, stomped on then ceremonially
> incinerated.
An experiment in lateral thinking? I liked it, but there is no
accounting for taste.
>
> What's wrong with doing
>
> for (i = 0; i < conf->raid_disks; i++) {
>
> in a manner which can be understood without alcoholic fortification?
I guess... "Egoless programmer" and all that, "write for others to
read, not for the compiler", and as you say it comes to the same
number of bytes of code on common architectures.
>
> ho hum.
I must right code that Andrew can read.
I must right code that Andrew can read.
I must right code that Andrew can read.
I must right code that Andrew can read.
I must right code that Andrew can read.
I must right code that Andrew can read.
I must right code that Andrew can read.
I must right code that Andrew can read.
I must right code that Andrew can read.
I must right code that Andrew can read.
I must right code that Andrew can read.
I must right code that Andrew can read.
I must right code that Andrew can read.
I must right code that Andrew can read.
I must right code that Andrew can read.
I must right code that Andrew can read.
I must right code that Andrew can read.
I must right code that Andrew can read.
I must right code that Andrew can read.
I must right code that Andrew can read.
I must right code that Andrew can read.
I must right code that Andrew can read.
I must right code that Andrew can read.
I must right code that Andrew can read.
I must right code that Andrew can read.
I must right code that Andrew can read.
NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
