On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 07:16:13PM +0100, David Howells wrote: > Kirill Marinushkin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > IMO, the preferable fix depends on your future plan. > > If you plan to continue using both ANSI X9.31 DRNG and DRBG - I agree with > > the > > patch suggested by Artem Savkov. > > If you plan to reduce using ANSI X9.31 DRNG and use DRBG more widely - I > > suggest my patch. > > No such plans, TBH.
I agre with Kirill here, so if we are not trying to reduce ANSI X9.31 DRNG usage can we move on with the suggested patch, or are there any issues with it that need addressing? -- Regards, Artem
