Hi Ken, On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Ken.Lin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > We found a possible regression issue (not seen in kernel 4.7-stable), which > has to do with the new NXP commit ba7f4f557eb67ee21c979c8539dc1886f5d5341c > when we did a DP test (1920x1080@60) with clock source PLL5. > The DP desired pixel clock (148.5MHz that is calculated from the input of PLL > output frequency) would be correct again when we reverted this commit. > Could you please help check if the commit has the side effect since it would > have impacts on our on-going project when it requires moving from kernel 4.7 > to kernel 4.8 or newer version? > > Please check the following URL for the details > https://www.dropbox.com/s/7wc5jdp8unlsiob/possible_regression_for_clk_imx_correct_VL_PLL_rate_formula.pdf?dl=0
Do these patches from Emil fix the issue? http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg535204.html and http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg535203.html Thanks
