On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 09:01:44AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> While that isn't a horrible idea, it's also not something that we've
> enforced at *all* in the past. Would you suggest that we do this only
> for features in the generic CPUID leaves, or all features?
There's no reason to do anything really: the 0x0... CPUID leaf is owned
by Intel and 0x8... by AMD. So far, if AMD implements a feature in the
Intel leaf, it sets the respective CPUID bit. So a feature can be
present in multiple vendors. Thus you don't need the vendor name in the
define.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284
(AG Nürnberg)
--
