Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> writes:
>> >> PXA architecture have both legacy platform_data based configurations and
>> >> new
>> >> devicetree based ones.
>> > I don't see any platform data specific code in this driver. What am I
>> > missing ?
>> In a legacy platform, ie. without devicetree, we have CONFIG_OF=n.
>> How would cpufreq-dt be usable in this case ?
>> You can see such a platform in arch/arm/configs/mainstone_defconfig and
>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/mainstone.c as an example.
> Okay, so its not about platform_data as you said earlier. Rather it is
> about the CONFIG_OF option.
We're bickering about terminology.
Mine is that there are globally :
- platform_data _based_ configurations
=> drivers probing devices rely on platform_data structures for initial
=> that implies CONFIG_OF=n
=> pxa2xx-cpufreq is one of them, even if in this case no platform_data is
- devicetree based configurations
=> drivers probing devices rely on device-tree blob for initial configuration
=> that implies CONFIG_OF=y
- ACPI based configurations
=> drivers probing devices rely on ACPI data
- maybe PCI would deserve a place, but I don't think there is much
configuration in it
> In that case, what about making this driver depends_on !CONFIG_OF ? So
> that the DT users don't use it anymore.
Good idea, let me try it.
I'll see if it actually works before make another iteration of this patch.