From: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 20:48:28 +0200

Some data were printed into a sequence by six separate function calls.
Print the same data by a single function call instead.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
index b3d5b3e..f22687d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
@@ -148,14 +148,17 @@ static int c_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
                                if (elf_hwcap & (1 << j))
                                        seq_printf(m, " %s", hwcap_str[j]);
                }
-               seq_puts(m, "\n");
-
-               seq_printf(m, "CPU implementer\t: 0x%02x\n",
-                          MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR(midr));
-               seq_printf(m, "CPU architecture: 8\n");
-               seq_printf(m, "CPU variant\t: 0x%x\n", MIDR_VARIANT(midr));
-               seq_printf(m, "CPU part\t: 0x%03x\n", MIDR_PARTNUM(midr));
-               seq_printf(m, "CPU revision\t: %d\n\n", MIDR_REVISION(midr));
+               seq_printf(m,
+                          "\n"
+                          "CPU implementer\t: 0x%02x\n"
+                          "CPU architecture: 8\n"
+                          "CPU variant\t: 0x%x\n"
+                          "CPU part\t: 0x%03x\n"
+                          "CPU revision\t: %d\n\n",
+                          MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR(midr),
+                          MIDR_VARIANT(midr),
+                          MIDR_PARTNUM(midr),
+                          MIDR_REVISION(midr));
        }
 
        return 0;
-- 
2.10.1

Reply via email to