Em Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 06:57:56AM -0700, Andi Kleen escreveu:
> > What we do know about the CPU vendor event names is that they are vendor
> > specific,
> > and that's a pretty stable property. So my suggestion would be to simply
> > make it:
> > perf list vendor
> > with perhaps add aliases as well:
> > perf list model
> > perf list cpu-model
> > ... and 'perf list hardware' should probably also list all the vendor
> > specific
> > hardware events as well.
> Sure can change it.
> > Could we please work a bit more on making vendor specific hardware event
> > handling
> > more usable to people who don't care about internals?
> Do you prefer fully new patches, or are incremential patches ok?
I would like for you to base of my perf/urgent branch as of now, that
has those two patches yanked out so that the others can go thru.
Ingo, please consider pulling from the perf-urgent-for-mingo-20161017
tag, just signed and pushed, it has:
Tagger: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@redhat.com>
Date: Mon Oct 17 11:26:10 2016 -0300
- Fix handling of numa nodes in perf.data files (Jiri Olsa)
- Fix scrolling when refreshing 'perf top --tui --hierarchy' entries
- Fix building of JIT support on Ubuntu 16.04 (Anton Blanchard)
- Fix handling of events including .c and .o, that were being treated as
BPF scripts instead of vendor ones (Wang Nan)
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@redhat.com>