On 10/07, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> Hi Stephen and Mike
>  
>  On jeu., sept. 29 2016, Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clem...@free-electrons.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> > While trying using a peripheral clock on a driver, I saw that the clock
> > pointer returned by the provider was NULL.
> >
> > The problem was a missing indirection. It was the pointer stored in the
> > hws array which needed to be updated not the value it contains.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clem...@free-electrons.com>
> 
> I saw that you already did the pull request for the clk subsystem.
> 
> Do you consider to do a another pull request for the fixes?
> 
> It would be nice to have this driver working since the rc1 :)
> 
> For this driver an other fix is needed:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-September/459640.html
> 

Yep I was on vacation/conferencing during the merge window. I'll
be sending off a set of fixes in a couple days.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Reply via email to