On 10/07/2016 10:52 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
@@ -600,7 +630,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, mutex_acquire_nest(&lock->dep_map, subclass, 0, nest_lock, ip);if (__mutex_trylock(lock, false) || - mutex_optimistic_spin(lock, ww_ctx, use_ww_ctx)) { + mutex_optimistic_spin(lock, ww_ctx, use_ww_ctx, false)) { /* got the lock, yay! */ lock_acquired(&lock->dep_map, ip); if (use_ww_ctx) @@ -669,7 +699,8 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, * state back to RUNNING and fall through the next schedule(), * or we must see its unlock and acquire. */ - if (__mutex_trylock(lock, first)) + if ((first&& mutex_optimistic_spin(lock, ww_ctx, use_ww_ctx, true)) || + __mutex_trylock(lock, first))
Do we need a __mutex_trylock() here? mutex_optimistic_spin() will do the trylock and we have one at the top of the loop.
Cheers, Longman

