On 10/14/2016 6:30 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 05:52:50PM +0100, luis.olive...@synopsys.com wrote:
>> - is_slave = device_property_read_bool(&pdev->dev, "isslave");
> Which tree is this based on? I cant see the existing isslave property in
> mainline HEAD (commit 29fbff8698fc0ac1).
I'm replying for Luís, since at the moment he's not able to reply.
This is a custom property since this I2C core doesn't support both master and
slave at the same time.
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_ACPI
>> + is_slave = device_property_read_bool(&pdev->dev, "is-slave");
> This ifdef is broken. At least for arm64, a single kernel image can be
> booted with either ACPI or DT. We need separate accessors for DT and
> ACPI to handle these differently, or you need to explicitly check
> whether or not you have ACPI or DT at runtime.
Thanks for the feedback, I'll take a look at this